Authors

TexasBarToday_TopTen_Badge_Small

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Follow us on Twitter

Disclaimer

  • This blog is for information purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice. For client reasons, we might not cover or comment on certain cases.

October 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Texas Supreme Court weekly orders (5/3/13) | Main | West publishes incorrect rules »

May 07, 2013

Comments

Mark Trachtenberg

Wow. Shouldn't the appellee have the burden to argue that error wasn't preserved, so that the appellant can address the argument in its reply? That seems like a better rule than requiring an appellant to clutter up his opening brief with cites when the vast majority of the preservation points may be uncontested.

The comments to this entry are closed.